-
Interpretation versus replication
I had a discussion with a friend not too long ago. When it comes to covers, his opinion is that he would rather listen to the Beatles than someone else’s cover of it. So then our conversation went into musical interpretation versus replication. For me being a huge Beach Boys fan, a few years ago I too would have had the opinion that I would rather hear a Beach Boys version of “God Only Knows” than someone else’s cover version of it, until I heard MLTs “God Only Knows”. Now I prefer that to the Beach Boys version, because Mona and Lisa brings their own unique style and interpretation to it and adds to the experience of hearing that song while still remaining true to the integrity of the original song. The same apply to the Zombies version of “Time of The Season” vs MLT’s interpretation and Scott McKenzie’s “San Francisco” vs MLTs interpretation.
In the following two you tube videos, Leonard Bernstein goes into explaining what interpretation of music is versus replication and how each artists interpretation of a piece of music can be different and unique and add it’s own soul to it. In the 2nd video, John Lennon and Paul McCartney reinforces this point by stating they appreciate interpretation of their music over someone merely replicating it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZX_XCYokQo&t=10s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sJ0qb1TwIs
MLT are master interpreters and artists in the truest sense when it comes to covers, bringing their own unique style, art, and magic to the song such that you want to hear their version of a classic song because they bring something new and refreshing to it all while remaining true to the essence of the original piece.  That is why their covers are so special.
What do you think?
Log in to reply.